投稿

ラベル(The Supreme Court of Japan will make a ruling ignoring Article 97 of the Constitution of Japan. The referendum law violating Article 96 will also rule as constitutional.)が付いた投稿を表示しています

NO. 003 The referendum law for amending the constitution violates the current Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution. However, the Supreme Court will decide that it is constitutional. This is because Japanese courts intentionally ignore Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution. In Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution, the procedure of revision of the Constitution of Japan has been defined.・ ・ ・ Theme label: The Japanese Supreme Court ruled in violation of the Constitution, no Japanese understood the Japanese Constitution in the past 70 years,

Japanese courts will intentionally ignore Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution. This article is a provision that guarantees the people the basic human rights that have been built up in human history, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Because of the existence of this article, the concept of “public welfare” found in the Constitution of Japan is also attached to basic human rights universal to humankind and cannot be defined by the Japanese government. If this article is ignored, public welfare can be defined by the Japanese government. Since basic human rights that are against public welfare are not allowed, the Japanese government can deprive the basic human rights of the people as the government desires. And it becomes possible for the government to set the public's duty to realize public welfare as desired. Like the former Japanese Empire. If the Supreme Court complies with this Article 97, I judge that the Supreme Court sho