Mail to White House : Friend of Max Weber Significance of Japanese Constitution

Think logically. Takeshima problem and recruitment problem. “Takeshima is clearly treated as a Japanese territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” says the Cabinet Secretariat, but that is not necessarily the case. The world's international law experts may have determined that the Japanese government does not understand international law. Let's mention the article of the Cabinet Secretariat. https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/ryodo/ryodo/takeshima-sanfrancisco.html Under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Takeshima was not included in the territory that Japan would return to Korea. South Korea requested the United States to include Takeshima as a return territory. On the other hand, the US rejected Korea's claim as unjustified. The United States at this time did not conclude that Korea's claim was wrong. “Korean claims are not recognized as correct. Korean claims are not recognized as incorrect.” This is logically the meaning. “Takeshima cannot

North Korea problem. A South Korean official said, “If Korea owns nuclear weapons, the US-ROK alliance is no longer necessary.” This is the opinion of the senior official. I don't think there is any wonder if there is a person who holds that the US-Korea Alliance is not necessary. I personally think the US-ROK alliance is beneficial. I think that there are a lot of people who can make an appropriate decision and are half the abolition of the US-ROK alliance. “Korea possesses nuclear weapons, abolishes the US-ROK alliance, and concludes the China-ROK alliance.” This is another option for Korea. I think there is a problem consciousness behind this senior official's theory. “Unification of the Korean people.” Korea is not a multi-ethnic country. The Korean people are a single ethnic group. They share a single tradition and culture. I think the root of the North-South issue in Korea is the division of ethnic groups. Due to the division of the ethnic gro

I cannot judge the right or wrong of GSOMIA disposal decision itself. At the moment, the right or wrong of this decision itself will be second. First, Korea's President Moon Jae-in, for the first time, asserted his true intentions without having to withstand the United States. This was the first time that Korea was able to solve problems. Problem solving can only be done by choice in a responsible free will. For the first time, Korea gained the potential to solve problems. I cannot judge the right or wrong of GSOMIA disposal decision itself. There is only one point of concern regarding repetitive remarks in the Japanese media regarding this issue. Everyone is upset. ... This is one point. At least on this issue, I don't trust the remarks of people who speak in Japanese mass media. Everyone speaks on the assumption that their remarks are unconditionally correct. Japanese people are saying that President Moon Jae-in's statement is unconditiona

For America, it seems like an annoying story. The US Department of Defense seems to have been promoting defense policies with Japan and South Korea after repeated meetings. It is a waste of what America has been doing so far for the sudden change of policy in Korea. The US spends a lot of money on military exercises with Japan and Korea. I think President Moon Jae-in will be mentally unbearable to work with the Abe administration. Looking at the behavior of the Japanese government towards Korea, I thought it was extremely insulting to the Korean people. The Korean people thought that they could not restrain themselves from raising the voice of protests, both in the comfort women issue and in the recruitment issue. Korean people set up a statue of a military comfort woman in front of a Japanese embassy, ​​etc., and expressed their intention to protest. Because the Japanese government's behavior was extremely insulting the Korean people, I thought that the Ko

I wonder that North Korea and South Korea do not unite their ethnic groups. Korea should be a single ethnic nation with a common tradition. It would be the Korean War 70 years ago that North Korea and Korea were divided. Until then, it should have been a single Korean nation. For the past 70 years, there must have been people who had memories before the division. If solidarity consciousness was established as a Korean people, the people of the north and south would have kept in touch even after the division of the north and south. The Chinese Han people would have done so. Han people seem to share a strong sense of solidarity among people with a common tradition. Chinese Han people will be connected by a strong network among the Chineses of the world. That is the strength of the Chinese. If North Korea and South Korea were Han Chinese countries, the North and South people would have kept in touch underwater. And the North and South Korean governments woul

I am aware of intense pleasure. "Korea finally has the heart to stand up." This makes Korea a truly reliable partner. In my eyes, Korea seemed to have been a loser for a long time. Until now, Korea just seemed to continue to mourn and grief to the whole world that they were victims of war. "We are the victims of the war. How poor are we?" East Asians remarked immediately after the end of World War II. "We will forgive Japan. Japan is also a victim of war." I think that those people had the mind to confront themselves. So I think I was able to say that. Recently, there was a statement that "We can forgive, but we must not forget the past history." People in East Asia have not changed yet. Huawei in China had already prepared its next business strategy when it was sanctioned by the US government. Korean industries are miserable losers if Korean industries are just hit and excluded from the Japanese government&

It is a trial of  Recruitment work trial , but there is no way to meet the demands of the Japanese government. To require the Japanese government to intervene in the Supreme Court decision is to demand the denial of the principle of separation of the three powers. Is it justified that the Japanese government requires the Korean government to deny constitutionalism? Notwithstanding the text of the Japan-Korea agreement, in the area of ​​authority to the constitutional government, the Korean government will have an obligation? The Japanese government's liability is that for the recruitment of a contractor as a national policy? If the recruited company violates human rights against individual individuals, each individual is settled in the judiciary Is that right? "I want the court to judge in the judicial field because the company's human rights violations did not fall back. If the Japanese government says that I will make reparations, I will