投稿

ラベル（Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution）が付いた投稿を表示しています

NO.114 The Japanese Supreme Court will judge Kamikaze as Constitutionality ・・・ Theme label: Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution,Japanese Supreme Court will judge Kamikaze as Constitutionality

-
The Japanese Supreme Court ruled ignoring Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution. Article 97 of the Constitution of Japan guarantees the Japanese people basic human rights universal to all mankind that mankind has cultivated throughout history. The Japanese Supreme Court defines the meaning of the words in the Japanese constitution. Assuming Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution, the Japanese Supreme Court does not have the authority to define what basic human rights (basic human rights are like in Japan, human rights in English). So the Japanese Supreme Court ignores Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution.
In NHK's reception contract trial in December 2017, the Japanese Supreme Court ruled that the broadcasting law was constitutional. The Broadcasting Law stipulates that those who purchase televisions have an obligation to enter into a receiving contract with NHK. The refusal of the receiving contract argued in trial that "the broadcasting law violates the Japanese constitut…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.113 Japanese leaders judge as if they were God. I want a child. I want children even if I get cancer. I feel like the Japanese leaders judge me to be "not allowed". ・・・ Theme label: Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution,Japanese Supreme Court will judge Kamikaze as Constitutionality

-
On October 1st, I will have a medical medical examination. At that time, I'm afraid to find cancer. I am single now and have no children. I want children even if I get cancer.
I think there is no problem. In order to get a child, I need the consent of the other woman. The woman who gave birth to my child must be prepared to raise herself until her child becomes an adult. If the woman understands everything and accepts me for marriage, that should be no problem. If I don't meet such a woman, I can't get married.
I'll share my will. I refuse to treat cancer with the side effects of losing fertility. If I don't have children, staying alive will be a pain. At that point, I will choose to end my life. If possible, I want to die with less suffering, but I can't help suffering.
If I was making a contribution that I could only do, no one would make the contribution I had made.
From this point of view, I feel a strong awareness of various issues.
I searched the internet for artic…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.110 What the former eugenics protection law trial shows ・・・ Theme label: Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
In accordance with the provisions of the Japanese Old Eugenic Protection Law, several persons with intellectual disabilities have undergone sterilization without being informed of the person. The mentally handicapped were told for the first time that they had undergone sterilization after their surgery.
There was a similar case in the United States written in an Internet article. I can't mention the American social environment because I think it is different from Japan. In Christian society, I think forced sterilization is not allowed in principle. Because it is a judgment that "the intellectually handicapped person is guilty of having reproductive ability." If forced sterilization is allowed in a society with this principle, there will be considerable circumstances.
This is the case in Japan. The person who enacted the former eugenics protection law ruled, “It is a sin for an intellectually disabled person to have fertility”. This judgment was made not by God but by humans.
Pe…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.109 If I get cancer, can I leave offspring in the future? ・・・ Theme label: Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
On October 1, 2019, I will have a medical medical examination. I am now dominated by one obsession.
"Can cancer be found."
If you get cancer, can you leave offspring in the future?
I am 60 years old now. I am single with no marriage history. The present hope is to leave the offspring in the future. Only that can be considered. I don't know if I have the ability to leave offspring. Still, I want to leave my offspring in the future. Even if I get cancer, I want to keep my offspring in the future.
When I was young, I needed a long time to get mentally bad and recover. I couldn't get married. I was able to recover now. When I was in my twenties, I didn't think I could recover so far.
And now I am checking my heart. I want to leave offspring even if I get cancer. I want a woman who will give birth to my child to have my child even if I have cancer.
I don't know if I can live until my child grows up. Still, I want a woman who gives birth to my child to give birth to my chi…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.065 If the referendum law is judged to be constitutional, the Japanese Supreme Court may be judged as a war criminal in the United Nations War Court.・・・ Theme label: The purpose of establishing the Japanese Constitution is described in the preamble of the SF Peace Treaty. Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
I touched on the above, but it's important and repeats.
Japan's constitutional amendment is not just a domestic issue. I think it will be a war crime in the United Nations. The current Constitution of Japan was enacted under the guidance of GHQ by Marshal MacArthur. His purpose was to realize the end of World War II.
Specifically, the end of the war was to realize a peace treaty between the United States and Japan and make Japan a member of the United Nations.
The United States once again needed a guarantee that Japan would not repeat the tragedy of World War II. To that end, it was necessary for Japan to become a pacifist state and to become a democratic state where the basic human rights of individuals were guaranteed.
The enacted Japanese constitution was a declaration by Japan that Japan would become a pacifist state and that Japan would be a nation that would guarantee the basic human rights of individuals. As a result of the evaluation of the established Japanese constitution, …
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.064 The referendum bill for amendment of the Japanese constitution must be examined based on Article 108 of the Charter of the United Nations.・・・ Theme label: Japanese referendum law violates Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution. Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
I think that the referendum bill for amendment of the Constitution of Japan must be examined based on Article 108 of the Charter of the United Nations?
The referendum law was established in accordance with the provisions of Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution, but the standard for interpretation of Article 96 of the Japanese Constitution would be Article 108 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 96 This constitutional amendment must be approved by more than two-thirds of all members of the House of Representatives, and the Diet shall propose it, propose it to the public, and go through its approval. This approval requires a majority vote in favor of a special referendum or an election set by the Diet. ○ 2 When the constitutional amendment has been approved under the preceding paragraph, the Emperor will immediately promulgate it in the name of the public as an integral part of this constitution.

United Nations Charter Article 108 This constitutional amendment was adopted by a m…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.020 Isn't the Japanese Supreme Court intentionally ignoring Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution? Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution guarantees the people's universal basic human rights to the people. The Japanese Supreme Court would like to eliminate this. The Japanese Supreme Court would like to decide the definition of basic human rights themselves. ・・・ Theme label: The purpose of establishing the Japanese Constitution is described in the preamble of the SF Peace Treaty. Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
Article 97 of the Constitution of Japan stipulates that the basic human rights that Japan guarantees to the people are the basic human rights that humanity has built up in history. The LDP wants to delete this text. This draft is to be deleted in the LDP draft constitutional amendments currently pending.
https://jimin.jp-east-2.storage.api.nifcloud.com/pdf/news/policy/130250_1.pdf
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/blog/constitution-jimin.html
Article 97 The fundamental human rights that this Constitution guarantees the Japanese people are the result of humanity's many years of efforts to gain freedom, and these rights endure many trials in the past, for the present and future people. On the contrary, it is entrusted as a permanent right that can not be violated.
This legitimacy of Article 97 is understood to be described in the preamble of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which has been mentioned several times. According to this preamble, the enacted Constitution of Japan is the condition f…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.019 A decision was made at the Sendai District Court in the former Eugenic Protection Law trial. Why wasn't it judged unconstitutional in violation of Article 97 of the Japanese Constitution? Do Japanese courts ignore Article 97? ・・・ Theme label: The purpose of establishing the Japanese Constitution is described in the preamble of the SF Peace Treaty. Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
In the former Eugenics Protection Law trial, a judgment was given in the Sendai District Court. In this trial, under the former Eugenics Act, people who were judged to have a high possibility of becoming a disabled child were forced to undergo infertility surgery without being aware of the person. It is a trial that asked for compensation. ... I raise questions about the judgment of the Japanese trial.
Since the ruling violates the right of individuals to pursue happiness, as defined in Article 13 of the Constitution of Japan, the Old Superiority Protection Act is unconstitutional and invalid. However, because it was over 20 years of civil law statute of limitations, it was a judgment that compensation was not permitted. ... Why did the judgment not go against the Constitution as a violation of Article 97 of the Constitution of Japan?
Respect for human dignity and respect for human character are not the most basic of basic human rights, or are they not the only ones to which basic human…
コメントを投稿
続きを読む

NO.018 In December 2017, in the Supreme Court decision of the inbound contract trial, the Broadcasting Law was judged constitutional. Japanese democracy committed suicide. ・・・ Theme label: Receiving contract refusal disputed in court that "Broadcast Law violates the Constitution of Japan that guaranteed freedom of contract", Japan's Supreme Court rulings that violate the constitution

-
The following are the sentences that were spelled immediately after the Supreme Court decision of the NHK reception contract trial was made in December 2017.
The Supreme Court's decision against NHK's receiving contract refusal was announced that "forcing a television installer to have a receiving contract with NHK is constitutional." The Supreme Court ruled the Broadcast Act as the only legitimate principle that the people should obey. The Supreme Court does not allow any protests by those who "oppose the principles of the Broadcast Act and choose to act in protest." It is only one of the people's duty to fulfill according to the principles of the Broadcast Act. Forced.
The Supreme Court denied the basic human rights of the individual saying, "Freedom of thought."
Japan's democracy committed suicide. The ruling in the Supreme Court will be the Precedentin a future trial.
Isn't the broadcast law really a violation of the constitution, and is …
コメントを投稿
続きを読む