Mail to White House : Friend of Max Weber Significance of Japanese Constitution

Iran is expected to achieve 20 percent uranium enrichment in a short period of time. It was a very short time after the withdrawal of the US nuclear agreement. There is legitimacy in the withdrawal of the US nuclear agreement. If Iran has malicious intent, it has been proved that it can be nuclear-armed in a very short period of time. If the United States assumes Iranian malice, the United States has no choice but to demand a complete abandonment. However, at the moment, Iran's malicious presence is denied. Iran has declared its will. Iran calls on the US to lift economic sanctions. Iran declares that if America does not respond to economic sanctions, it will eventually choose war. Iran continues to announce the progress of the development of nuclear weapons. Iran is willing to continue developing nuclear weapons unless the US lifts economic sanctions. Iran understands that America will start war before Iran completes its nuclear weapons. In other words, Ir

For Dar al-Islam, I use the following as the sole basis: I examined jihad at Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on the Internet. I will quote below. This article was a turning point from the World Encyclopedia of Japan's Heibonsha. We have determined that the copyright issue has been resolved. “In the Islamic law philosophy, the world must be an established Islamic sovereign Dar Al-Islam. An unestablished world is defined as Dar al-Harb (war world). , Where Jihad is needed until Islamic sovereignty is established. " Jihad's etymology seems to be “effort”. In order to realize world peace, Muslims must make constant efforts. This effort seems to be of a character that must be continued forever. Efforts to realize and maintain world peace must be maintained as long as mankind survives. This is a rule of history. Apparently, the definition of Dar al-Islām is set in a separate Islamic code from Quran. Then I thought whether I would interpret Quran d

We propose that Iran take on and secure the safety of navigation in the Strait of the Holmes. The safety of navigation in the Strait of Holmes should be a benefit to Iran. It should be in the interests of Iran that the vessels sailing the Strait of Holmes take on securing security, even if they are registered in another country. It is hard to think that the leader of the recent tanker terrorism is Iran. First of all, there is no benefit for Iran to conduct such terrorism. Not only that, but Iran is suspected first. Moreover, it is right after the time that Mr. Homemé of Iran requested the Japanese Prime Minister Abe to conduct an arbitration with the United States. Conducting such acts of terrorism at the same time would put Abe, who accepted the arbitration, at a disadvantage and destroy the trusting relationship between Japan and Iran. It will be a third party conspiracy trying to defeat Iran. I think this is something everyone will consider. If Mr. Homen d

I would like to join China, Russia, and even India, the Coalition of the willing. To persuade the United States to avoid the war with Iran. I think that many countries want the United States and Iran to avoid war. I think many countries want to persuade the United States and Iran to avoid war. In the world situation, events such as war have their influence spread to every corner of the whole world. The war between the United States and Iran in the Middle East is a major disadvantage for many countries. Many countries understand this. In order to try to persuade the United States to avoid the war with Iran, I think a nation must join a volunteer coalition. Because now America does not have the intention to listen to the remarks of countries other than the Coalition of the willing. Countries that have a voice to influence the United States are China, Russia, and India. India is the hub of the Indian Ocean. For the United States, it should be necessary for India t

As of July 18, 2019, Iran continues to declare that, "We will continue to make highly enriched uranium beyond the ceiling set in the nuclear agreement, unless the economic sanctions that have been promised in the nuclear agreement have been lifted." ing. Since nuclear weapons require more than 90 percent enriched uranium, the United States can not make a war with Iran because Iran continues to produce about 5 percent uranium? When the US gets into a war, many Americans die. Because Trump is angry at the remarks of the Iranian government, the United States will start a war and as a result, Americans will not forgive Americans to die. Doesn't it mean that the U.S. people and the nuclear agreement participating countries must admit that Iran's uranium enrichment is within the scope of peaceful use? So, countries other than the United States can not face Iran with a strong stance. It seems that participating countries in the nuclear agreement are al

A spokesman for the Iranian Atomic Energy Agency announced on 17th that the low-enriched uranium stock would exceed the upper limit set by the nuclear agreement on 27 June. ...? Do you say that one government agency of the Iranian government made this decision? And the spokesman also said that if a nuclear agreement party urged the United States to fulfill the agreement, he would refrain from excess. Did the spokesman threaten the countries concerned? So, in Iran, regardless of the government's top intentions, people in each department will be able to move their departments without permission? A spokesman has made a statement that threatens the countries involved that could cause In other words, Iran is a country in which those who have been commanded to manage nuclear missiles from the country's chief officer will launch nuclear missiles without permission. Iran is not good at all, and Iran has never thought about war diplomacy because it has no intentio

Mr Bolton warned Iran that he should not think America is weak. Are individuals and groups who are inspiring people, saying, "The United States is weak," exist in Iran? I think this situation is dangerous. The United States will not be able to tolerate this condition forever. It is difficult for the United States to understand Islam. And those who are willing to use this thing will exist. So, they continue to try to prevent the United States from understanding Islam. Because the United States does not understand Islam, the United States can not formulate a purpose-oriented policy against Islam. To that end, the United States hesitates to take action. There are those who are trying to use this thing. @khamenei_ir was also recognized as an enemy trying to use the Sunni and Shia rivalry. The United States will soon take action. If it is recognized that the United States has attacked Islam, then Muslims who have been moderate may also decide to step in on Jih

Is this account opened to listen to the voices of people in non-Islamic societies for peace and well-being? If so, please listen to the following story. For example, if it is an account for Islamic faith, please forgive me that I made an inappropriate submission without knowing. I tried to search the site, trying to send a message to everyone in Iran, but I could not find it. I think that this means that you, Iran, are not willing to communicate with non-Muslims and try to understand each other. The government of Iran has been asked by Prime Minister Abe to arbitrate the settlement with the United States, but it would not be useful. It is because you can not have the intention to get the United States agreement seriously. The United States will not allow it to try to get over the technique of the upper part only. It looks like that to me. President Trump quietly makes a request that could be fatal if it fails. It is because there is a belief. For the United States, we

The following contents were sent to Twitter, a religious leader in Iran. URL https://twitter.com/ojamay1/status/1141663486616862720 Homer of Iran's top religious leader told Prime Minister Abe that, for religious reasons, Iran would not hold weapons of mass destruction, but I think that other countries would not be able to accept it. Promises for religious reasons will always be kept. But even if other countries trust this word, they will not be able to accept that promise. If something goes wrong, there is a possibility that nuclear weapons will be manufactured with highly enriched uranium produced by Iran and that nuclear weapons will be used. The tragedy caused by the use of nuclear weapons is too great. The possibility that the tragedy is triggered must be completely abolished. It is a temporary case. Suppose that Iran manufactures low-enriched uranium for peaceful use, and religious leaders say it is for peaceful use to anyone outside the cou

Suppose that the United States has attacked Iran by military. The Iranian state will be completely destroyed. However, Islamic sects will remain. They will decide on retaliation. A second Islamic country may be built. Muslim religious leaders all over the world may declare that the Muslim state has been destroyed by Christians and call on the believers to jihad. A turbulent situation will arise. The impact will spread to all countries in the whole world. For example, the EU has no habit of being irrelevant. It is a modified version. It was a story I heard in the news during the war in Iraq. When the Hussein government collapsed, people looted government buildings. Then, it seems that the religious leader examined the scripture and said that "public things must be returned to the public." Then people carried what they had stolen into the mosque. It does not lead people by receiving revelation from God. It seems as if a lawyer looks at a law book and teache

Ask the following contents to Islamic people. This problem has been done so many times in the past. Iran has produced low-enriched uranium above the upper limit specified in the nuclear agreement. Doesn't it mean that Iran has violated the nuclear agreement for each country participating in the agreement? The United States has left the nuclear agreement. For each country that is still participating, "If Iran keeps the agreement, we will also keep it. The choice of the United States is irrelevant." Isn't a nuclear agreement a collection of individual agreements between Iran and other participating countries? Is that not a rule? For participating countries in the nuclear agreement, the reason for participating is that it would be in the interests of Iran to protect the nuclear agreement, or if the United States would withdraw, if Iran continues to comply with the agreement Things should have been appreciated. The participating countries have decid