NO.278 Message to President Trump 16 ・・・ about the actual situation of Japanese justice and the actual situation of Japanese freedom of speech. The Japanese Broadcasting Law stipulates that anyone who has a television must make a contract with NHK. This is a Japanese civil law contract. It is a prerequisite that both parties who sign a contract agree and conclude. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to guarantee the right of Japanese citizens to know, the principles stipulated by the Broadcasting Law and the policies stipulated by the Broadcasting Law must be strictly observed. To this end, the Supreme Court has ruled that the people are obliged to agree on a contract with NHK. Mass media should not report the claims of those who claim to refuse the NHK agreement because they are specific individuals. This is the philosophy of the Broadcast Law. The only place where the Internet could make that individual's claim. The Japanese parliament has voted to amend the Broadcasting Law so that the principles of the Broadcasting Law apply to the Internet.


Comments on Trump's site.

About the actual situation of Japanese justice and the actual situation of Japanese freedom of speech. Japan is an American ally. So, tell the Americans:

The Japanese Supreme Court has ruled that the philosophy of the Broadcast Law deserves to force individuals to contract. This is a civil law contract. Even in Japan, civil contracts are based on the agreement between the two parties.
The Broadcasting Law was enacted to guarantee the right of Japanese citizens to know. Japanese citizens have the right to know information that is not biased by a particular individual or group. NHK, a public broadcaster, has a mission to broadcast information that is not biased by the claims of particular individuals or organizations. Information that is not biased toward the assertion of a particular individual or group is defined as unbiased information. Private broadcasts broadcast certain individuals or assertions. The two broadcasting systems guarantee the people's right to know.
Whether certain information is unbiased information is always examined.

Japanese citizens are obliged to bear the costs of securing the means to guarantee their right to know. The cost burden must be fair to all Japanese citizens. Therefore, the purchaser of the television is obliged to enter into a contract with NHK. And the contract between the people and the NHK must be deemed to be made when the people purchase the television. The contract between the people and NHK is that the people keep paying the receiving fee to NHK on a regular basis.
Anyone who claims to refuse an agreement with NHK and does not pay the receiving fee must pay NHK the receiving fee from the time the person purchased the television.
The Japanese Supreme Court ruled as above.

Many people in Japan now choose not to have a TV to refuse a contract with NHK. They use the internet. The Japanese parliament has proposed and amended the Broadcasting Law so that people can watch NHK programs on the Internet.

Internet users will seek information that is only available on the Internet. In the future, obtaining such information will become more difficult.



Even if it is a domestic issue in Japan, if it is related to the interests of the United States, I would like to raise a problem. I want to gain the understanding of everyone in the United States.

In my last comment, I mentioned the Japanese Broadcasting Law. The Broadcasting Law requires that those who purchase a television have a contract with NHK. Many people claim to refuse the contract with NHK. Many of them contend with NHK in court. "Broadcasting law violates the Constitution of Japan, which guarantees freedom of contract." This is the claim of those who insist on refusal to contract with NHK.
The Japanese Supreme Court has ruled that the philosophy of the Broadcasting Law deserves to force citizens to contract with NHK. And the Broadcasting Law ruled that it did not violate the Constitution of Japan.
The ruling does not specify why the Japanese Supreme Court made such a decision. The judgment of the Supreme Court is the precedent of the subsequent trial. Many people can speak out if they understand the reasons for the ruling. However, in Japan this is not allowed.
Japanese citizens must follow the Supreme Court ruling without understanding the reasons for the Supreme Court ruling.

I think as follows. I think the Supreme Court interpreted Article 13 of the Japanese Constitution as saying, "People must not assert their right against public welfare." I think the Japanese Supreme Court interpreted the philosophy of the Broadcast Law as public welfare. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled that citizens would not be allowed freedom of contract contrary to the principles of the Broadcast Law.

The Japanese Supreme Court seeks to define legal concepts on its own. The Supreme Court will try to enforce the logic based on that definition. Suppose the Supreme Court defined national interests as public welfare. It would be of national interest to conduct suicide bombing on Japanese enemies and defeat it. Citizens are not allowed to claim right to life against national interests.
The Japanese Supreme Court will rule the Kamikaze bill as constitutional in accordance with the current Japanese Constitution.

Depending on the situation, I think this will happen.



It is a continuation of the previous comment. I am really scared of Japanese justice. It is the responsibility of the Japanese to solve problems in Japan. If what I raised raised concerns the interests of the United States, I think it might be possible to gain the understanding and cooperation of the American people.

The Japanese Supreme Court ruled that the philosophy of the Broadcasting Law deserves to force individuals to contract. The Japanese Supreme Court ruled that the right to know an individual is guaranteed by the Broadcast Law.
The Broadcasting Act was enacted to guarantee the right of individuals to know.
The Japanese Supreme Court has determined that strict adherence to the principles stipulated in the Broadcasting Law and the thoroughness of the policies stipulated in the Broadcasting Law guarantees the right of people to know.
For this purpose, the Supreme Court has determined that it is legitimate for individuals to be forced to contract with NHK. The contract between the individual and NHK is a civil law contract. Individuals must hire attorneys themselves and fight for trial.

There is no mass media in Japan where anyone who claims to refuse a contract with NHK can claim their legitimacy. That person's claim is that of a particular individual. Violates the principles of the Broadcast Law.
In contrast, claiming NHK's policy is a justified claim universal to all Japanese citizens who is not biased to the particular individual or group.

The Japanese Supreme Court ruled that an individual signed a contract with NHK when they began owning television.

The Japanese parliament has voted that the principles of the Broadcast Law also apply to the Internet.
Japanese individuals have been deprived of the only place where they could claim their own legitimacy.

Perhaps many will desperate to resist and will choose to submit.


Previous article










TOP Article





コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

No.012 Iran's President Rouhani has officially stated that it will enrich uranium beyond the provisions of the nuclear agreement. Participants in the nuclear agreement must be prepared to make decisions. Only the enrichment of uranium that allows nuclear weapons production must be blocked. ・・・ Theme label: A second Islamic state will be born in destroyed Iran Category label: Iran

NO.095 Will Iran choose nuclear weapons development? ・・・ Theme label: Dar al-Islam constructed by Saudi Aramco's 200 trillion yen money creation. Category label: Macroeconomics, Religious Sociology, Jihad, Iran

NO.048 Facebook's cryptocurrency Libra: Banknotes also evolved from gold deposit certificates initially issued by gold depositors. Banknotes that are currently in circulation around the world were also first deposit certificates issued by private businesses. , ・・・ Theme label: Asset owners. We propose a charitable enterprise for the Great Depression.What kind of world is GAFA looking at? Category label: Macroeconomics