NO.244 "At this point, the Constitution of Japan should not be changed." If the Japanese media reports this claim head on, tragedy will be avoided. ・・・”At this point, the Constitution of Japan must not be changed." I argue that this needs to be a direct debate in Japanese society.


Prime Minister Abe and Governor of Osaka Prefecture, Matsui Nippon Restoration Association, met. ・・・ The two sides have agreed to promote discussions on constitutional revision at the Constitutional Review Committee of the Diet.

The Japan Restoration Association has been telling the Liberal Democratic Party that it will cooperate in revising the constitution. This time, the two sides agreed at the Constitutional Investigation Committee to promote discussions on constitutional revision.

The Liberal Democratic Party is a political party whose ideology is centralization. The Japan Restoration Association, on the other hand, is a group that focuses on decentralization and even local sovereignty. Both are political parties whose ideology on state sovereignty is the exact opposite.
The constitutional amendment that they both argue should be a completely different revision from each other.

The two sides have agreed to discuss and amend the constitution.
This time, the two sides have agreed to promote discussions at the Constitutional Investigation Committee.
Discussions at the Constitutional Investigation Committee are for consulting and deciding where to change the Japanese Constitution and what to change.

Political parties with completely different policies are trying to consult and decide how to change the Japanese Constitution.

In the Japanese mass media, "realization of the constitutional reform."

Prime Minister Abe issued a statement during the recent cabinet reshuffle. "Achieving the amendment of the Constitution of Japan is a difficult undertaking. However, I will do so by myself. This is my responsibility as the Prime Minister to the Japanese people."
Japanese mass media treats Prime Minister Abe's remarks as an unquestionable orthodoxy.

At present, the Japanese Parliament has established a constitutional review board in which all political parties participate. The ruling LDP members of the Diet assert that it is the duty of all members of the parliament to proceed with the constitutional review.

"Japanese parliamentarians have promised Japanese citizens a constitutional amendment. It is the duty of parliamentarians to fulfill their promises to them."
Both Japanese parliamentarians and the Japanese mass media argue. No one is opposed.

Problem presentation. Is revision of the Japanese Constitution necessary?

"Is it necessary to amend the Japanese Constitution?"
No one has raised this issue. "The constitution of Japan must not be changed at this time." No one has argued.

The Constitutional Investigation Committee is only allowed to discuss how to change the constitution.
It is not permissible to assert that the Japanese Constitution must not be changed at this time.

A voice claiming that the Japanese Constitution should not be changed at this time will not be featured in the Japanese mass media.

"At this point, the Constitution of Japan must not change." Those who claim this will surely exist.
However, their claims are not reported in the Japanese mass media.

Some Japanese parliamentarians may be aware of the dangers of constitutional reform. They do not directly oppose the constitutional amendment.
They point out various issues in the details of the referendum, and try to postpone the matter if the LDP does not respond and cannot respond to the discussion.

"At this point, the Constitution of Japan must not change." Unless this assertion is made head-on in society, tragedy will not be prevented.

At that time, I believe that an unrelenting judgment will be made. The referee is not the Japanese mass media or the Japanese government.


Related article







TOP Article

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

Link to Hatena Blog. Complement this blog・・・and, Japanese Version Letetter to White House at Google Blogger ,and My Linkedin

No.311 Gov bond with zero interest. Allow only central bank to buy. Gov execute new projects using this funds. This bond redeemed only when inflation rate exceeds upper limit. Solve problem. Please judge.

No.308 Potential in India. ・・・“God prepared India for the crisis of the world.” Some Christians may think so.