The Japan Restoration Association has been telling the Liberal Democratic Party that it will cooperate in revising the constitution. This time, the two sides agreed at the Constitutional Investigation Committee to promote discussions on constitutional revision.
The Liberal Democratic Party is a political party whose ideology is centralization. The Japan Restoration Association, on the other hand, is a group that focuses on decentralization and even local sovereignty. Both are political parties whose ideology on state sovereignty is the exact opposite.
The constitutional amendment that they both argue should be a completely different revision from each other.
The two sides have agreed to discuss and amend the constitution.
This time, the two sides have agreed to promote discussions at the Constitutional Investigation Committee.
Discussions at the Constitutional Investigation Committee are for consulting and deciding where to change the Japanese Constitution and what to change.
Political parties with completely different policies are trying to consult and decide how to change the Japanese Constitution.
Prime Minister Abe issued a statement during the recent cabinet reshuffle. "Achieving the amendment of the Constitution of Japan is a difficult undertaking. However, I will do so by myself. This is my responsibility as the Prime Minister to the Japanese people."
Japanese mass media treats Prime Minister Abe's remarks as an unquestionable orthodoxy.
At present, the Japanese Parliament has established a constitutional review board in which all political parties participate. The ruling LDP members of the Diet assert that it is the duty of all members of the parliament to proceed with the constitutional review.
"Japanese parliamentarians have promised Japanese citizens a constitutional amendment. It is the duty of parliamentarians to fulfill their promises to them."
Both Japanese parliamentarians and the Japanese mass media argue. No one is opposed.
"Is it necessary to amend the Japanese Constitution?"
No one has raised this issue. "The constitution of Japan must not be changed at this time." No one has argued.
The Constitutional Investigation Committee is only allowed to discuss how to change the constitution.
It is not permissible to assert that the Japanese Constitution must not be changed at this time.
"At this point, the Constitution of Japan must not change." Those who claim this will surely exist.
However, their claims are not reported in the Japanese mass media.
Some Japanese parliamentarians may be aware of the dangers of constitutional reform. They do not directly oppose the constitutional amendment.
They point out various issues in the details of the referendum, and try to postpone the matter if the LDP does not respond and cannot respond to the discussion.
"At this point, the Constitution of Japan must not change." Unless this assertion is made head-on in society, tragedy will not be prevented.
At that time, I believe that an unrelenting judgment will be made. The referee is not the Japanese mass media or the Japanese government.
Article 001 “The history of the establishment of the Constitution of Japan is written in the preamble of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.” This was the motivation for opening my blog
Letter to White House at Google Blogger My Linkedin Hatena Blog Japanese Blog TOP 叙事詩(になればいいな) KeitaYamada’s diary English Blog TOP Odyssey(wow!) Blog of keitayamada This Google Blogger blog "Letter to White House "is writing Japanese articles with an effort to make it suitable for google translation. This makes it difficult to read Japanese sentences. This "Mail to White House" is translated by Google translate from "Letter to White House". So My English in "Mail to White House" may be unnatural. For that reason, I decided to write a Japanese article on the Hatena Blog that does not care about Google translation. I wrote an Japanese article on the Hatena Blog that summarizes more than 20 Google Blogger blog articles. And I made an English article same as Japanese article on the Hatena Blog. I link to Those English article at below. I'll link it. If it is easy to read, please read it. I hope that G
No.311 Gov bond with zero interest. Allow only central bank to buy. Gov execute new projects using this funds. This bond redeemed only when inflation rate exceeds upper limit. Solve problem. Please judge.
Expansion of industry and economy. State will execute projects that private industries do not. Economy expands by that size. Circulate currency to society according to the scale of economy. Inappropriate to use taxes for this national project. Private industry shrink as much scale as the project. With right funding, NASA projects, for example, will revolutionize everything in the world. Government envisions the project. Central bank will issue new currency to supply necessary amount to the project. Gov issues zero-interest gov bonds in the amount necessary for project, and let central bank buy them. Let me explain. Industrial production is value-added production. Value-added is creation of monetary value from zero. Currency must be provided to there. Purchasing decide value-added of product.So, Executing natinal project always produce value-added. If product is not used, it's consumption. Pyramid construction is huge consumption. Supported ancient Egyptian economy. Let'
No.308 Potential in India. ・・・“God prepared India for the crisis of the world.” Some Christians may think so.
India's potential・・・My guess, from speculation. Japanese people who visit India suffer a culture shock from the caste system. They choose to be Indian friends. Hindu laws govern everything. When the upper caste and the lower caste come into contact with each other, an undesired "Cause" is created in the upper caste. "Cause" causes "Result". "Result" is the result of the dynamism of reincarnation. At this time, an undesired cause is not born to the person in the lower caste. In Indian society, the upper caste does not touch, for example, tableware that the lower caste touches. This causes culture shock to visitors from Japan. I think it is inappropriate to describe it as discrimination. It is a requirement by Hindu law. The highest level of the caste system is Brahmin, and below the four-step caste, there is a caste that is an outcast such as Dalit. The people of Dalit are all free. All are permitted under Hindu laws. I think the Brahmin peo