NO.165 Think logically. Takeshima problem and recruitment problem. “Takeshima is clearly treated as a Japanese territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” says the Cabinet Secretariat, but that is not necessarily the case. The world's international law experts may have determined that the Japanese government does not understand international law. ・・・ Theme label: North Korea and Korea. Pride of the Korean people.,
Think logically. Takeshima problem and recruitment problem. “Takeshima is clearly treated as a Japanese territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” says the Cabinet Secretariat, but that is not necessarily the case.The world's international law experts may have determined that the Japanese government does not understand international law.
Let's mention the article of the Cabinet Secretariat.
Under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Takeshima was not included in the territory that Japan would return to Korea. South Korea requested the United States to include Takeshima as a return territory.
On the other hand, the US rejected Korea's claim as unjustified.
The United States at this time did not conclude that Korea's claim was wrong.
“Korean claims are not recognized as correct. Korean claims are not recognized as incorrect.”
This is logically the meaning.
“Takeshima cannot determine whether it is a Korean territory or a Japanese territory.”
The US responded to Korea so.
The United States has not consistently changed this stance on the Takeshima issue.
There are many Japanese who lack the ability to think logically.
All Japanese remarks given the opportunity to speak in the mass media lack logical justification.
People from other countries have the ability to think logically.
People in other countries will judge the Cabinet Secretariat's claim as a violent claim.
"Japan forces us to make a logically violent claim. Japan will never accept our objections. This attitude of Japan will never change. Japan is trying to send the Self-Defense Forces to our territory. "
People in other countries will recognize this.
People from other countries recognize the SDF as a dangerous army.
The Japanese Self-Defense Forces dispatched overseas will be in a very dangerous state.
Currently, other countries have allowed the Self-Defense Forces to be dispatched overseas. This is because Japan has continued to comply with the current Japanese constitution. Other countries respect this Japanese achievement.
International law experts from other countries will be amazed at this allegation by the Japanese Cabinet Secretariat.
“The Japanese government does not understand international law.”
At the conclusion of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, only the final conclusion is stated in the text.
If the San Francisco Peace Treaty states that "Takeshima is Japan's territory," the Japanese government's claim is justified.
For the peace treaty, only the agreement between the two sides is stated in the article. If one party has a request that has no room for withdrawal, the treaty will not be signed unless the other party agrees.
If there is no mention of Takeshima in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Takeshima's territorial rights are unresolved.
The fact that the United States states the return of Takeshima in the San Francisco Peace Treaty means that the United States has decided that Takeshima has sovereignty over Korea.
The United States also respected Japan's claim to Takeshima's territorial rights. So there is no mention of Takeshima in this treaty.
Therefore, the Cabinet Secretariat article is a betrayal of the Japanese government against the United States.
America will be angry.
This US anger toward Japan may be reflected in the current US response to Japan.
This is not the only reason why America is angry with Japan.
Japan's claim to the recruitment problem is also completely lacking in logic. I mentioned in a previous article on this blog. See article NO.17.
What can be decided by an intergovernmental agreement is limited to the authority of both governments.
This is a logical assumption.
Judicial issues cannot be dealt with in an intergovernmental agreement. The Japanese government is no other than asking the Korean government to violate the principle of separation of powers.
A request to deny the principle of separation of powers cannot be justified under international law.
The recruitment tribunal is nothing but a judicial attempt to solve a problem between an individual worker and a company that cannot be dealt with in government consultations.
This is separate from the problem between the Japanese government and recruiters.
International law issues, unlike domestic law issues, will have a significant lack of legal basis to draw conclusions.
Prime Minister Abe frequently remarks "I violate international law" when criticizing the other party.
People in other countries will recognize that the Japanese government does not understand international law.
People in other countries will decide to deal with Japan on the premise of this.
Those who cannot make sound judgments are dangerous opponents who cannot predict what to do.
TOP Article
コメント
コメントを投稿