I heard that criticism has been made against the selection of this year's Nobel Prize winners.
I don't think it would be meaningful for a third party to criticize whoever won the Nobel Prize in Literature.
The Nobel Prize in Literature is an award that has nothing to do with human contribution. Nobel liked literature. The Nobel Prize for Literature is an award established to give award to authors who wrote Nobel's favorite literary works.
The Nobel Prize for Literature is an award given to the artist Nobel wishes.
So no matter who gives the Nobel Prize for Literature, it is Nobel's freedom, and criticizing this is rude to Nobel.
Nobel uses his property to give the writer a Nobel Prize.
As a general rule, no matter who receives which award, it is Nobel's freedom. This is a problem in the personal area of Nobel.
The Swedish Academy on behalf of Nobel will select the winners and give them awards.
Does this mean that the Swedish Academy has taken over the Nobel personal territory?
It would be to respect Nobel ’s willingness to wish to contribute to humanity.
It can be interpreted as Nobel's will to reward those who do not pay even if they contribute to humanity.
If you respect Nobel's will, it would be meaningful to select an unnamed writer as a winner.
Even writers who produce excellent works are often not known to the people of the world.
Even readers who like great works will not read them unless they know it.
The Nobel Academy can entrust the selection of works to the world's leading professionals.
World literary enthusiasts will trust the works recommended by the Nobel Academy.
World enthusiasts would not know the work unless the Nobel Academy introduced it. World literary enthusiasts can meet the work thanks to the Nobel Academy.
The Nobel Academy will contribute to literature by continuing to introduce not only three works every year, but also many unknown works.
I think that changing the policy in this way will gain the support of many people.
Message to Trump's account Administrators of this account. United States Government. This is a war between all mankind and the coronavirus. President Trump should declare this. When the United States declares war, the United States puts all its power. Stock prices will rise. The US President has finally decided. This is a war, not a joke. This is a war between humanity and the coronavirus. It is now necessary that the President of the United States decide on war. I suggest making a huge investment in a NASA project. If the economy is so bad, many people will be fired from GAFA and other high-tech companies. Before that, headhunt the best people and get involved in NASA projects. The best people won't be needed for these companies, as they seem to be companies that can do nothing at all. NASA seriously considers the immigration of humanity to extragalactic space. Because NASA also observes the universe outside the galaxy. NASA is funded by US state funding. NASA c
NO.303 Message to President Trump 39 ・・・ Considerations as of March 17, 2020 Japan Time. Countries have jointly implemented maximum quantitative easing. The Fed has moved to a virtually zero interest rate. Entrepreneurs are not willing to use the investment funds provided. Stock prices fall because investors can't find investment opportunities. In the United States and Europe, entrepreneurs do not try to solve problems themselves. They wait for others to help them. Then, I propose Keynes's policy. The United States sets a national purpose and declares a state enterprise to achieve the purpose. Giving huge funds to the national business. If war, the US government could do this. This is a war between all mankind and the coronavirus. I suggest that Trump do this.
A collection of comments on Trump's account. Comments on this account may have been viewed by the US government, CDC, investors, wealthy and entrepreneurs. So I make this comment. The current stock market is very volatile. So I raise a problem. If you have a worthwhile comment, a lot of people will be watching. If a pandemic spreads all over the world, a truly dangerous situation may arise. The greater the population of a virus, the greater the chance of mutation. As the pandemic spreads worldwide, the risk of the virus making truly dangerous mutations increases. If my perception is correct, stopping the spread of infection itself has value. It is expected that infectious disease booms will occur repeatedly in the years before the drug is completed. Today's human society is vulnerable to epidemics. The spread of the infection will disrupt economic activity and cause stock prices to crash. Wealthy people also make losses. In order for people to succeed in busin
Link to Hatena Blog. Complement this blog・・・and, Japanese Version Letetter to White House at Google Blogger ,and My Linkedin
Letter to White House at Google Blogger My Linkedin Hatena Blog Japanese Blog TOP 叙事詩(になればいいな) KeitaYamada’s diary English Blog TOP Odyssey(wow!) Blog of keitayamada This Google Blogger blog "Letter to White House "is writing Japanese articles with an effort to make it suitable for google translation. This makes it difficult to read Japanese sentences. This "Mail to White House" is translated by Google translate from "Letter to White House". So My English in "Mail to White House" may be unnatural. For that reason, I decided to write a Japanese article on the Hatena Blog that does not care about Google translation. I wrote an Japanese article on the Hatena Blog that summarizes more than 20 Google Blogger blog articles. And I made an English article same as Japanese article on the Hatena Blog. I link to Those English article at below. I'll link it. If it is easy to read, please read it. I hope that G