NO.002 I object to changing the Constitution of Japan. The current Constitution of Japan will benefit the purpose of the Japan-US Security Treaty. I object to changing the Constitution of Japan. In conclusion, changing the Japanese Constitution means withdrawing the agreement of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, ・・・ Theme label: The purpose of establishing the Japanese Constitution is described in the preamble of the SF Peace Treaty. Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan and Japanese Constitution,




One Japanese. I would like to ask everyone.

As mentioned below, the historical significance of the current establishment of the Japanese Constitution is shown in the preamble to the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
The current Constitution of Japan is the one that Japan declared to the world to comply with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and the Japan-US Security Treaty was concluded on the premise of the establishment of this Constitution of Japan. This justification can be asserted to all United Nations member states.

As a conclusion of this, those who attack the United States as well as Japan are considered terrorists. The Japan-US Security Treaty is an alliance for fighting terrorists. This can be justified in United Nations member states.

This in itself should be a powerful deterrent.

By the way, the duty of Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan is an obligation to the sovereign state that the other party seeks peace, not an obligation to terrorists.

Therefore, Japan, which complies with the current constitution of Japan, has no problem in joint defense against terrorists attacking the United States.

The Japan-US Security Treaty stipulates Japan's duty to defend Japan, but does not stipulate Japan's duty to defend the United States. However, it is possible for Japan to participate in defense against the United States. Only this thing is stated clearly.

We should deter all means to prevent an armed attack against the United States. When Japan was unable to prevent someone from realizing an attack on the United States, everything ended for Japan. I think so from the perspective of a Japanese.

However, none of Japan's parliamentarians and government officials claim the historical significance described in the preamble to the San Francisco Peace Treaty.

All those who speak in Japan do not consider this historical significance at all, make all the claims, and those who try to realize the constitutional amendment do not consider this historical significance at all. I am trying to execute the revision.

The result is Japanese responsibility.

I object to changing the Constitution of Japan. In conclusion, changing the Constitution of Japan means withdrawing the agreement of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. And that means that Japan has chosen the path of fascism.

I learned about the San Francisco conference. The meeting was held by the Allies after World War II, and I learned that it was decided to conclude a peace treaty (San Francisco Peace Treaty) and create a United Nations.

From the preamble to the San Francisco Peace Treaty, the enacted Japanese Constitution was recognized as proclaiming Japan's protection of basic human rights and the peaceful resolution of problems, the objectives of the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. , I learned that the treaty was signed and Japan joined the United Nations.

It seems that MacArthur's GHQ has made the Japanese draft of the current Japanese Constitution. And this seems to have been corrected by GHQ. I understand that the revised Constitution of Japan has been judged to be a provision that fulfills the purposes of the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations are the guarantee of basic human rights and the resolution of problems by peaceful means. The United Nations, in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, I learned that the mechanism aims to universalize solutions by peaceful means.

United Nations member states have agreed to respect the Charter of the United Nations and should have joined. Therefore, we understand that Japan that continues to comply with the current Constitution of Japan should be respected as a country that continues to comply with the principles of the UN Charter.

As Japan fought World War II as a fascist nation, I speculate that Japan's accession to the United Nations was required to ensure compliance with the two fundamental principles of the above-mentioned Charter of the United Nations. I think that the enacted Japanese constitution was a declaration of this promise.

I understand that Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution is a culture of the philosophy of Article 1, Paragraph 1 of the Charter of the United Nations, with the exception of statements about collective self-defense. The purpose of collective self-defense does not need to be described in the Constitution of Japan because it fights against terrorism. I understand that the provisions of the Constitution of Japan are what Japan has promised to implement in countries that respect the Charter of the United Nations.

Therefore, the amendment of the Constitution of Japan means a change in the declaration that became a condition of Japan's conclusion of the San Francisco Peace Treaty and accession to the United Nations.

The Self-Defense Force is a force for the fight against terrorism. The current Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution covers other sovereign states and does not require any description of the Self-Defense Forces.

Adding a statement about the Self-Defense Forces is to withdraw respect for Article 1 paragraph 1 of the Charter of the United Nations.

Considering the purpose of enacting the Constitution of Japan, this constitution should be designed so that it needs almost no revision.

I think of it as described above, and I am obsessed with the nightmare that Japan would once again deny basic human rights guarantees and pacifism, and take the path to a fascist state again. I am appealing to all of you.

Currently, the Liberal Democratic Party of the ruling party in Japan repeatedly accuses it of being a party that was formed to revise the Japanese constitution. Does that mean that the Liberal Democratic Party was originally aimed at refusing to join the San Francisco Peace Conference and the United Nations?



TOP Article
Message to Lady M

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

NO.306 Message to President Trump 41 ・・・ This is a war between all mankind and the coronavirus. The meaning of President Trump's declaration would be beneficial. The whole world will be able to implement projects that put all the will and power of the nation in order to overcome coronavirus infection. Keynes policy is needed. Many companies around the world are temporarily suspended. Many people are fired temporarily. People who have purchased products until now can no longer purchase products. The performance of companies that continue to do business deteriorates. This causes a recession. The government needs to hire the unemployed and keep paying them. The government orders the required number of respirators. If there is not enough production equipment, the government will expand.

NO.303 Message to President Trump 39 ・・・ Considerations as of March 17, 2020 Japan Time. Countries have jointly implemented maximum quantitative easing. The Fed has moved to a virtually zero interest rate. Entrepreneurs are not willing to use the investment funds provided. Stock prices fall because investors can't find investment opportunities. In the United States and Europe, entrepreneurs do not try to solve problems themselves. They wait for others to help them. Then, I propose Keynes's policy. The United States sets a national purpose and declares a state enterprise to achieve the purpose. Giving huge funds to the national business. If war, the US government could do this. This is a war between all mankind and the coronavirus. I suggest that Trump do this.

Link to Hatena Blog. Complement this blog・・・and, Japanese Version Letetter to White House at Google Blogger ,and My Linkedin